Jones v. Nicholl

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Evidence that merely casts a bare suspicion on another or ‘raise(s) a conjectural inference as to the commission of the crime by another is not admissible. (Cits.)’ [Cit.]”
• permissible to ask defendant who did not invoke right to remain silent why he failed to respond to particular questions during interview
• defendant did not invoke right to remain silent during interview and thus testimony regarding his failure to respond to particular questions was admissible
• permissible to ask defendant who did not invoke right to remain silent why he failed to respond to particular questions during interview
• defendant did not invoke right to remain silent during interview and thus testimony regarding his failure to respond to particular questions was admissible
• “As Curry did not invoke his right to remain silent during the interview, the testimony regarding Curry’s failure to respond to [particular] questions [while providing his statement] was admissible.” (citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).