Skip to main content
· 2/28/1992

Jones v. Neuroscience Associates, Inc., P.A.

Citations

  • 827 P.2d 51
  • 250 Kan. 477
  • 1992 Kan. LEXIS 64

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a fact issue remained as to when the plaintiff knew her condition caused by surgery was “permanent, i.e., substantial”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lockett

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.