Jones v. Mukasey

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that D.C. precedent consistently submits that courts should not address arguments raised for the first time in a party's reply
• holding that D.C. precedent consistently submits that courts should not address arguments raised for the first time in a party's reply
• holding it to be \improper\ for defendant to raise an affirmative defense \for the first time in his summary judgment motion\
• noting caselaw holding that courts should not address arguments raised for the first time in a party’s reply
• denying summary judgment because evidence of a statistically significant deviation between the hiring of African-American and white applicants, in conjunction with other evidence, raised an issue of pretext
• denying summary judgment because evidence of a statistically significant deviation between the hiring of African-American and white applicants, in conjunction with other evidence, raised an issue of pretext

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).