Jones v. Midgley

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• referring to the support question in a 1987 ITC antidumping investigation questionnaire
• stating, in regard to an ITC threat determination, that “[tjhe industry best knows its own economic interests and, therefore, its views can be considered an economic factor. Indeed an industry’s failure to acknowledge an affirmative threat has direct significance.”
• “The industry best knows its own economic interests and, therefore, its views can be considered an economic factor. Indeed an industry’s failure to acknowledge an affirmative threat has direct significance.”
• court considered evidence submitted to agency in rebuttal to corresponding information from party opponent on which agency at least in part expressly based determination before court for review
• “Although reviewing anew the ITC determina- tion, this court will not ignore the informed opinion of the Court of International Trade. That court reviewed the record in considerable detail. Its opinion deserves due respect.”
• describing statutory differences for material and threat cases

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).