Jones v. Mercedes

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing that issues raised for first time in reply brief are deemed waived and will normally not be considered on appeal
• explaining that FCA complaint must establish, inter alia, existence of claim, its falsity, and that claim was made to the Government
• stating that issues insufficiently argued in briefs are considered waived and normally will not be addressed on appeal
• using the pre-amendment elements while stating, in a footnote, that the amendments \do not materially alter\ the analysis
• \[T]he relators cannot show a conspiracy to commit fraud given that they have not sufficiently pleaded fraud under the FCA\
• “[T]he relators cannot show a conspiracy to commit fraud given that they have not sufficiently pleaded fraud under the FCA.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).