Jones v. Maroney

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Thus, it becomes apparent that the purpose for which the [homestead] statute was enacted would be destroyed if the court would not toll the statute during the period of time the proceeds were involved in court litigation.”
• “Thus, the statutory period in which the proceeds from the above sale would be exempt for 6 months would date from August 19, 1980 [i.e., the date that the court entered judgment for the homestead claimants].”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

• The Matter Of: Michael Zibman Jamie Bailey Zibman, Debtors. Michael Zibman Jamie Bailey Zibman v. Rodney D. Tow, Trustee
  Fifth Circuit· 2001-09-28· cited 83×
• Walston v. Walston
  Tex. App. Ct., 10th Dist. (Waco)· 1998-07-15· cited 59×
• Sarah M. Harris v. United States
  Fifth Circuit· 1985-07-08· cited 41×
• In Re Sissom
  S.D. Texas· 2007-05-11· cited 33×
• In Re Bading
  W.D. Texas· 2007-09-22· cited 10×
• London v. London
  Tex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2011-07-14· cited 9×
• England v. FDIC (In Re England)
  N.D. Texas· 1991-11-25· cited 6×
• Wiggains v. Reed (In re Wiggains)
  N.D. Texas· 2015-08-21· cited 4×
• Gulamali v. Dinh (In re Dinh)
  S.D. Texas· 2016-12-13· cited 2×
• In Re Malone
  W.D. Texas· 1996-10-10· cited 1×
• In Re: Zibman
  Fifth Circuit· 2001-12-13
• Emma G. Barrera and Nickolas Barrera v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2005-07-21
• in Re Leticia London
  Tex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2011-05-17

Other cases named Jones v. Maroney

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

• Jones v. Maroney
  Supreme Court· 1954-01-11
• Jones v. Maroney
  Supreme Court· 1961-04-17