Jones v. MacMillan Bloedel Containers, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• suggesting that notice, rather than retirement, begins the 300 day limitations period to challenge mandatory retirement policy
• remanding case for proper exercise of discretion where district court refused to award prejudgment interest based on theory, unsupported by record, that award of lump sum to plaintiffs gave them investment income they otherwise never would have had
• remanding case for proper exercise of discretion where district court refused to award prejudgment interest based on theory, unsupported by record, that award of lump sum to plaintiffs gave them investment income they otherwise never would have had
• “courts would be deciding disputes prematurely”
• arbitrary percentage reduction of entire fee rejected

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).