Skip to main content
· 9/30/1913

Jones v. Lickliter

Citations

  • 154 Ky. 848
  • 159 S.W. 652
  • 1913 Ky. LEXIS 179

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[w]here, as here, a court is faced with two interpretations of a contract, courts have avoided adopting an interpretation that renders clauses of the contract meaningless or superfluous”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Carroll

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.