Skip to main content
· 4/11/1887

Jones v. Kroll

Citations

  • 116 Pa. 85
  • 8 A. 857
  • 1887 Pa. LEXIS 365

Syllabus

<p>1. Though, it be error to submit to a jury the construction of a written lease, yet if tire jury have found it what the court should have declared it to be, there is no just cause of complaint.</p> <p>2. A parly, having been permitted after objection overruled to put in parol evidence in construction of a written lease, may not, after verdict and judgment against him, sustain error to the action of the court in submitting the construction to the jury.</p> <p>3. A lease for one year with a provision that if the tenant should continue on the premises after the first year, then the lease should be in force for another year and so on from year to year, is a lease binding but for one year: per Arnold, A. J.</p>

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • removal of a declared nuisance did not automatically give rise to a valid municipal claim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Clark, Gordon, Green, Merour, Paxson, Sterrett, Trunkey

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.