Skip to main content
· 10/15/1849

Jones v. Inhabitants of Waltham

Citations

  • 58 Mass. 299

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding “Smith's claims are merely a regurgitation of what was argued and ruled upon by this Court previously. His attempts to relitigate this issue are therefore precluded by the ‘law of the case’ doctrine.”
  • concluding “Smith’s claims are merely a regurgitation of what was argued and ruled upon by this Court previously. His attempts to relitigate this issue are therefore precluded by the ‘law of the case’ doctrine.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Metcalf

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.