Jones v. Illinois Employers Insurance of Wausau

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “We will therefore consider [the plaintiff’s] motion as a response to the motion for summary judgment and nothing more.”
• “Because Jones seeks benefits for an injury that occurred in 1978, this case is governed by the Workers’ Compensation Act in effect at the time of his injury.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).