Jones v. Illinois Educational Labor Relations Board

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• upholding Board’s striking of exceptions to recommended decision because exceptions were not served upon opposing party in violation of regulation governing filing and service of documents
• upholding Board's striking of exceptions to recommended decision because exceptions were not served upon opposing party in violation of regulation governing filing and service of documents
• Board used powers found in section 5(i) of Act to promulgate regulation found in section 1100.20 of Code, which allows for the striking of exceptions to a recommended decision if not first served on opposing party
• \`[T]he duty of fair representation is not automatically breached when a union takes a position contrary to the interest of some of its members.'\ (quoting Moore, 206 Ill. App.3d at 333, 151 Ill.Dec. 236, 564 N.E.2d at 217)
• Board used powers found in section 5(i) of Act to promulgate regulation found in section 1100.20 of Code, which allows for the striking of exceptions to a recommended decision if not first served on opposing party
• “ ‘[T]he duty of fair representation is not automatically breached when a union takes a position contrary to the interest of some of its members.’ ” (quoting Moore, 206 Ill. App. 3d at 333, 564 N.E.2d at 217)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).