Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 5/6/1983
Jones v. Hurst
Citations
- 459 A.2d 219
- 54 Md. App. 607
- 1983 Md. App. LEXIS 283
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- involving an express denial of liability coupled with language in the release stating that the settling defendant would be considered a joint tort-feasor “to the same extent and effect as if judgments had been rendered against them (sic
- involving an express denial of liability coupled with language in the release stating that the settling defendant would be considered a joint tort-feasor “to the same extent and effect as if judgments had been rendered against them (sic) as joint tort-feasors (sic).”
- release included language that settling defendant was considered to be a joint tortfeasor “as if judgments had been rendered against” it
- “Under the [UCATA], certain consequences ensue when an injured person releases one of several joint tort-feasors. One of those consequences may be a reduction in any judgment the injured party recovers against remaining tort-feasor(s).”
- formally holding what had previously been suggested by dicta
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Wilner, Garrity, Adkins
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
18 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Scapa Dryer Fabrics, Inc. v. SavilleCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2011-03-23· cited 49×
- Porter Hayden Co. v. BullingerCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1998-05-15· cited 47×
- Collier v. Eagle-Picher Industries, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1991-02-05· cited 42×
- Rivera v. Prince George's County Health DepartmentCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1994-12-02· cited 30×
- Allgood v. MuellerCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1986-08-27· cited 19×
- Mercy Medical Center v. JulianCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2012-11-27· cited 14×
- Garlock, Inc. v. GallagherCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2003-01-17· cited 12×
- Saadeh v. Saadeh, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2003-03-28· cited 12×
- In Re Joint E. & S. Dist. Asbestos LitigationS.D. New York· 1995-01-19· cited 11×
- Findley v. FaliseE.D. New York· 1995-01-19· cited 8×
- Lawrence Foreman v. AO Smith Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals· 2015-09-22· cited 6×
- Kulikov v. Baffoe-HardingCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2013-11-21· cited 5×
- Hashmi v. BennettCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2009-10-28· cited 4×
- Chilcote v. Von Der Ahe Van LinesCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1983-07-07· cited 4×
- Tempel v. MurphyCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2011-10-28· cited 3×
- St. Louis v. BecklesCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1989-12-05· cited 2×
- Spence v. JulianCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2011-10-26· cited 1×
- Gables Construction v. Red CoatsCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2019-05-10
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Richard J. Griffin and Mary Jane Griffin, His Wife v. United StatesThird Circuit· 1974-06-25· cited 217×
- General Motors Corp. v. LahockiCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1980-02-29· cited 102×
- Davis v. MillerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1956-06-25· cited 97×
- Swigert v. WelkCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1957-06-10· cited 69×
- Lahocki v. Contee Sand & Gravel Co.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1979-03-08· cited 57×
- Martinez v. LopezCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1983-04-14· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.