Jones v. Harewood

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding no merger of interlocutory orders because “failure to prosecute a claim should carry no . . . reward”
• explaining earlier grant of summary judgment did not merge into later dismissal under Rule 41(b) and, therefore, was unreviewable on appeal
• plaintiff's failure to comply with numerous pretrial orders and failure to appear for trial justified dismissal with prejudice
• pro se plaintiff’s claims properly dismissed for failure to appear at trial and prosecute case
• “[D]ismissal for failure to prosecute bars review of earlier entered interlocutory rulings.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).