Skip to main content
· 12/13/2005

Jones v. Greenspan

Citations

  • 402 F. Supp. 2d 294
  • 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 32228
  • 87 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 42,225
  • 2005 WL 3370438

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “To qualify as a causal connection . . . , the temporal proximity between the [defendant’s] knowledge of the protected activity and the adverse . . . action must be ‘very close’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Urbina

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.