Skip to main content
· 5/16/2016

Jones v. Fla. Parole Bd.

Citations

  • 136 S. Ct. 2025
  • 195 L. Ed. 2d 229
  • 84 U.S.L.W. 3632
  • 2016 U.S. LEXIS 3348

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • affirming district court decision to exclude testimony where expert did not articulate any basis for a panoply of variables and assumptions underlying methodology
  • “[T]he addition of control premiums is a standard valuation technique”; discussing appraisers’ valuation of control when valuing preferred shares

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.