· 5/16/2016
Jones v. Fla. Parole Bd.
Citations
- 136 S. Ct. 2025
- 195 L. Ed. 2d 229
- 84 U.S.L.W. 3632
- 2016 U.S. LEXIS 3348
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- affirming district court decision to exclude testimony where expert did not articulate any basis for a panoply of variables and assumptions underlying methodology
- “[T]he addition of control premiums is a standard valuation technique”; discussing appraisers’ valuation of control when valuing preferred shares
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.