Jones v. Firemen's Relief & Pension Board

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• declining to find that the subrogation statute at issue supplanted equitable subrogation principles absent a clear indication of legislative intent to require full repayment regardless of the fact that the injured fireman did not receive full recovery for his injuries
• insurer is not entitled to subrogation until the insured has been fully compensated for his injuries
• Legislature did not express intent to displace equitable subrogation principles when it adopted statutory remedy creating right to subrogation unaccompanied by the right to assert a statutory lien
• insurer is not entitled to subrogation until the insured has been fully compensated for his injuries

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).