Jones v. Finch
Citations
- 84 Va. 204
- 4 S.E. 342
- 1887 Va. LEXIS 23
Syllabus
<p>1. Practice at common law—Malicious prosecution—Declaration—Demurrer—■ Case at bar.—In action for malicious prosecution, fourth count of declaration substantially alleges that maliciously, and without any probable cause, the defendant had plaintiff arrested on a warrant procured by defendant from a United States commissioner, by whom, upon consideration of all the evidence, he the plaintiff was acquitted and discharged, and that the prosecution was wholly ended and determined. To this count defendant demurred.</p> <p>Held:</p> <p>Demurrer overruled.</p> <p>2. Idem—U. S. Commissioner—Justice of the peace.—Upon principle, there is no distinction between the effect of the judgment of a U. S. Commissioner and that of a justice of the peace in this State.</p>
Judges: Richardson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
- McElroy v. Catholic Press Co.Illinois Supreme Court· 1912-04-18· cited 29×
- Barton v. CamdenSupreme Court of Virginia· 1927-03-17· cited 15×
- Munger v. CoxCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 1926-02-25· cited 12×
- Western Union Telegraph Co. v. ThomassonFourth Circuit· 1918-05-07· cited 6×
- Jennings v. ShepherdOhio Court of Appeals· 1914-05-28· cited 1×
Cites
2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Other cases named Jones v. Finch
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.