Skip to main content
· 6/15/2016

Jones v. Executive Office for United States Attorneys

Citations

  • 650 F. App'x 45

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • determining that, on a motion to dismiss, it was premature for the Court to resolve the question of plaintiff’s reliance on an oral, extra-contractual representation, but noting that the contract’s merger language “may be a factor the jury to consider at trial” regarding reasonableness

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Randolph, Tatel, Williams

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.