Jones v. Dorsey

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that the prejudgment interest rule described in Public Market Co. v. Portland, 171 Or 522, 625, 138 P2d 916 (1943), applies to both legal and equitable claims
• explaining that the prejudgment interest rule described in Public Market Co. v. Portland, 171 Or 522, 625, 138 P2d 916 (1943), applies to both legal and equitable claims
• describing trial court’s award of monetary sanctions under ORCP 46 D for failure to produce documents

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Precision Seed Cleaners v. Country Mutual Insurance
  D. Oregon· 2013-10-01· cited 33×
• Cumming v. Nipping
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2025-01-29· cited 2×

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Strader v. Grange Mutual Insurance
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2002-01-30· cited 56×
• Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. Tualatin Tire & Auto, Inc.
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1997-03-20· cited 43×
• Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. Tualatin Tire & Auto, Inc.
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1994-07-27· cited 14×
• Liggett v. Lester
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1964-03-18· cited 14×
• Hazelwood Water District v. First Union Management, Inc.
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1986-03-12· cited 13×
• Smith v. Williams
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1989-09-06· cited 9×
• McBride v. FITZPATRICK
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1960-11-09· cited 4×
• Deyoe v. Holloway
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1989-04-05· cited 2×