Jones v. Destiny Industries, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• ruling that husband entitled to new trial in defamation ease because jury awarded compensatory and punitive damages against both husband and wife on erroneous theory that the two were jointly liable
• promissory es-toppel has no application where promise relied on was for employment or agency relationship for an indefinite period
• “Promissory estoppel has no application in the instant case where the promise relied on, if any, was for employment or an agency relationship for an indefinite period of time.”
• extending principle to non-U.C.C. context

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).