Jones v. Deposit & People's Bank

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting, in the Title VII context, that “[c]ourts have found that, even if a policy is facially non-discriminatory, if it is not enforced uniformly across gender lines, a valid discrimination claim may exist”
• \There is no question that directly complaining to an employer about a discriminatory policy is sufficient to constitute 'protected activity' for purposes of his Title VII and NYSHR retaliation claim.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).