· 2/2/1982
Jones v. Department of Employment Security
Citations
- 442 A.2d 463
- 140 Vt. 552
- 1982 Vt. LEXIS 446
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that “when the meaning of a statute is plain on its face we must enforce it according to its express terms”
- where meaning of statute plain, Court must enforce it according to its express terms
- amendment of statute shows legislative intent to change effect of existing law
- “[N]o claimant should be excluded unless the law clearly intends such an exclusion.”
- broad remedial interpretation of the Unemployment Compensation Act
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Barney, Billings, Hill, Underwood, Peck
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.