Jones v. Del Andersen and Associates

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “when [the Supreme Court of Texas has] determined the legislative intent expressed in unambiguous language, our function is not to question the wisdom of the statute. In the absence of constitutional infirmities, we must apply [the statute] as written”
• in determining legislative intent, court begins with the language of the statute itself
• in determining legislative intent, court begins with the language of the statute itself
• “In the absence of constitutional infirmities, we must apply [statutes] as written.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).