Jones v. Dacosta

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding, in a “common law breach of contract and/or fraud theory” case, that the individual pro se plaintiff could not submit a claim for attorneys’ fees (citing Kay v. Ehrler, 499 U.S. 432, 435 (1991))
• corporation may not assign interest in case to individual in order for individual to litigate claim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).