Jones v. Cranman's Sporting Goods

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reversing summary judgment on implied warranty claim because privity existed and implied warranties were not expressly excluded
• \The weapon here was `fully guaranteed’ by the distributor to the ultimate consumer. As such it became part of the bargain of sale and thus privity existed.\
• “[I]n this state privity is required in order to impose liability under the theory of express or implied warranty.”
• corporation could be held liable for subsidiary’s warranty

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).