· 4/30/2024
Jones v. Clyde Morris Landlings Partners, LTD, Clyde Morris Landings
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the Sixth Amendment was violated because “the sentencing court relied on facts outside the indictment,” and that its analysis therefore “involved more than the ‘fact of a prior conviction’ ”
- district court’s determination, after fact-finding, that prior conviction was a crime of violence did not come within Apprendi 2 exception for “fact of a prior conviction”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.