Skip to main content
· 2/24/2014

Jones v. City of Montgomery

Citations

  • 134 S. Ct. 1300
  • 188 L. Ed. 2d 302
  • 82 U.S.L.W. 3491
  • 571 U.S. 1199
  • 2014 WL 684102
  • 2014 U.S. LEXIS 1578

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that Octane Fitness “exceptional case” standard for attorneys’ fees under Patent Act also applies to Lanham Act
  • holding that the Octane Fitness standard applies not only to Patent Act cases but also to Lanham Act cases
  • remanding for the district court to apply the Octane test
  • “‘[A]n ‘exceptional’ case is simply one that 25 stands out from others with respect to the substantive strength of a party’s litigating position 26 (considering both the governing law and the facts of the case) or the unreasonable manner in 27 which the case was litigated.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.