· 2/24/2014
Jones v. City of Montgomery
Citations
- 134 S. Ct. 1300
- 188 L. Ed. 2d 302
- 82 U.S.L.W. 3491
- 571 U.S. 1199
- 2014 WL 684102
- 2014 U.S. LEXIS 1578
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that Octane Fitness “exceptional case” standard for attorneys’ fees under Patent Act also applies to Lanham Act
- holding that the Octane Fitness standard applies not only to Patent Act cases but also to Lanham Act cases
- remanding for the district court to apply the Octane test
- “‘[A]n ‘exceptional’ case is simply one that 25 stands out from others with respect to the substantive strength of a party’s litigating position 26 (considering both the governing law and the facts of the case) or the unreasonable manner in 27 which the case was litigated.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.