Jones v. C. & O. R. R.
Citations
- 14 W. Va. 514
- 1878 W. Va. LEXIS 77
Syllabus
<p>1. Whether a condition contained in a deed is a condition precedent or subsequent, is a question of intention in the grantor, to be gathered from the whole instrument.</p> <p>2. But whether the condition be precedent or subsequent, if the act of the party who imposed the condition makes its performance impossible, or unnecessary, the condition is no longer binding, and the estate conveyed by the deed, in which it is contained, is discharged therefrom.</p> <p>3. A general verdict for the defendant in an action of ejectment, if warranted by the evidence, is proper; and no disclaimer is necessary to its validity, although much moi eland was described in the declaration, than the defendant had in possession at the commencement of the action.</p>
Judges: Johnson, Other
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
8 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Tapscott v. CobbsSupreme Court of Virginia· 1854-04-15· cited 39×
- Toppins v. OshelWest Virginia Supreme Court· 1955-10-18· cited 27×
- King Iron Bridge & Manuf'g Co. v. City of St. LouisU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Missouri· 1890-11-05· cited 18×
- Phillips v. GannonIllinois Supreme Court· 1910-06-29· cited 15×
- Galt v. ProvanSupreme Court of Iowa· 1906-07-12· cited 11×
- Morris v. NelsonWest Virginia Supreme Court· 1951-12-18· cited 5×
- Eastham v. EasthamCourt of Appeals of Kentucky· 1921-05-24· cited 1×
- Smith v. RasinCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1897-01-06
Cites
1 case in this archive is cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.