Skip to main content
· 12/21/1878

Jones v. C. & O. R. R.

Citations

  • 14 W. Va. 514
  • 1878 W. Va. LEXIS 77

Syllabus

<p>1. Whether a condition contained in a deed is a condition precedent or subsequent, is a question of intention in the grantor, to be gathered from the whole instrument.</p> <p>2. But whether the condition be precedent or subsequent, if the act of the party who imposed the condition makes its performance impossible, or unnecessary, the condition is no longer binding, and the estate conveyed by the deed, in which it is contained, is discharged therefrom.</p> <p>3. A general verdict for the defendant in an action of ejectment, if warranted by the evidence, is proper; and no disclaimer is necessary to its validity, although much moi eland was described in the declaration, than the defendant had in possession at the commencement of the action.</p>

Judges: Johnson, Other

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.