· 7/10/1990
Jones v. Burk
Citations
- 795 P.2d 238
- 164 Ariz. 595
- 64 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 78
- 1990 Ariz. App. LEXIS 237
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- declining to disturb attorneys’ fees award under A.R.S. § 12-1103(B) because both parties “fail[ed] to point to evidence suggesting an abuse of discretion”
- “Issues not clearly raised and argued in a party’s appellate brief constitute waiver of error on review.”
- “Issues not clearly raised and argued in a party’s appellate brief constitute waiver of error on review.”
- “Issues not clearly raised and argued in a party’s appellate brief constitute waiver of error on review.”
- “Issues not clearly raised and argued in a party’s appellate brief constitute waiver of error on review.”
- “Issues not clearly raised and argued in a party’s appellate brief constitute waiver of error on review.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Howard, Roll, Hathaway
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.