Skip to main content
· 7/10/1990

Jones v. Burk

Citations

  • 795 P.2d 238
  • 164 Ariz. 595
  • 64 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 78
  • 1990 Ariz. App. LEXIS 237

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • declining to disturb attorneys’ fees award under A.R.S. § 12-1103(B) because both parties “fail[ed] to point to evidence suggesting an abuse of discretion”
  • “Issues not clearly raised and argued in a party’s appellate brief constitute waiver of error on review.”
  • “Issues not clearly raised and argued in a party’s appellate brief constitute waiver of error on review.”
  • “Issues not clearly raised and argued in a party’s appellate brief constitute waiver of error on review.”
  • “Issues not clearly raised and argued in a party’s appellate brief constitute waiver of error on review.”
  • “Issues not clearly raised and argued in a party’s appellate brief constitute waiver of error on review.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Howard, Roll, Hathaway

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.