Jones v. Automobile Club Inter-Insurance Exchange

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the UIM insurance company was responsible for the difference between Plaintiff’s pro rata share of a $43,000 settlement and $20,682.15 in total damages
• indicating the possibility for collusion in a group settlement required remand for a factual determination of the actual damages of the multiple claimants

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).