Skip to main content
· 3/3/2004

Jones v. Ashcroft

Citations

  • 321 F. Supp. 2d 1
  • 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11687
  • 2004 WL 1379887

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • dismissing a claim for failure to comply with the 180-day requirement where plaintiff prematurely filed suit and argued that the EEOC process was unlikely to produce a settlement
  • relying on Hill and Martini in analyzing an exhaustion claim where the plaintiff previously filed an administrative appeal
  • dismissing a claim for failure to comply with the 180-day requirement where plaintiff prematurely filed suit and argued that the EEOC process was unlikely to produce a settlement
  • dismissing Title VII claim of federal employee for failure to wait 180 days from the date of filing an administrative complaint where 12 the EEOC had not issued a final decision
  • inability to stand, sit, or walk for more than thirty 7 minutes was a substantially limiting impairment
  • FBI’s suitability determination not subject to Egan because it was “distinct from national security determinations”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Huvelle

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.