Jones v. Allen Cty. Common Pleas Court

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that subject matter jurisdiction is tested as of the time of the filing of the complaint
• holding that the \to be in violation\ language in the Clean Water Act requires a showing of an ongoing or intermittent violation
• holding that the \to be in violation\ language in the Clean Water Act requires a showing of an ongoing or intermittent violation
• holding that if the defendant ceases its violations prior to the filing of the complaint, the action is barred
• holding that citizen plaintiffs may not sue for \wholly past\ violations of the Clean Water Act but must instead allege \continuous or intermittent\ violations
• holding that jurisdiction is established “when the citizen-plaintiffs make a good-faith allegation of continuous or intermittent violation”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).