Skip to main content
· 7/26/1994

Jones v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.

Citations

  • 26 Cal. App. 4th 1717
  • 33 Cal. Rptr. 2d 291
  • 94 Daily Journal DAR 10549
  • 94 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5820
  • 1994 Cal. App. LEXIS 773

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Whether a third party is an intended beneficiary or merely an incidental beneficiary to the contract involves construction of the parties’ intent, gleaned from reading the contract as a whole in light of the circumstances under which it was entered.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Merrill

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.