Jones Motor Company, Inc. v. Chauffeurs, Teamsters and Helpers Local Union No. 633 of New Hampshire, Etc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that party’s submission of case for summary judgment and willingness to accept determination of the case on the merits before moving for arbitration was inconsistent with the right to arbitration
• noting that Supreme Court precedent “warns [courts] against being overready to find a waiver”
• finding waiver where union engaged in discovery, presented a motion for summary judgment, and awaited the outcome of the district court’s determination on the merits
• discussing repudiation and distinguishing between conduct that occurred prior to filing of complaint and conduct subsequent thereto
• listing factors other than time and prejudice when determining whether a party has waived arbitration
• finding that union “has by its conduct in court waived any right that it might have to insist on arbitration” of employer’s claim for damages from an illegal strike, because it answered complaint, engaged in discovery, and filed for summary judgment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).