Skip to main content
· 7/20/2015

Jones, Isaac James

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “For purposes of Frye, an expert need not rely on studies that mirror the exact facts under consideration.”
  • “For purposes of Frye, an expert need not rely on studies that mirror the exact facts under consideration.”
  • “For purposes of Frye, an expert need not rely on studies that mirror the exact facts under consideration.”
  • “For purposes of Frye, an expert need not rely on studies that mirror the exact facts under consideration.”
  • “For purposes of Frye, an expert need not rely on studies that mirror the exact facts under consideration.”
  • “Frye requires that a proponent of novel scientific testimony demonstrate that the expert relied upon and conventionally applied a scientific method generally accepted in the relevant scientific community.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.