Jones Distributing Co. v. White Consolidated Industries, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that the parties had a non-exclusive contract where the record demonstrated that they had always operated as if their relationship was non-exclusive
• existence of a fact basic to the transaction that would affect a party's desire to enter the transaction insufficient standing alone, there also must be some facts indicating some special relationship between the parties
• also observing that the law of the forum controls this question as well
• elements- of fraud and fraudulent, uon-disclosure
• elements of fraud and fraudulent non-disclosure
• discussing unconscionability in Illinois and elsewhere

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).