Jonathon Swink v. Andrew Saul

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the court must affirm the ALJ’s RFC assessment if a “reasonable mind would find [the evidence] adequate to support it.” (internal quotation omitted)
• holding ALJ is permitted to issue decision without obtaining additional medical evidence where other evidence in record provides sufficient basis for decision
• holding ALJ permitted to issue decision without obtaining additional medical evidence where other evidence in record provided sufficient basis for decision
• holding ALJ permitted to issue decision without obtaining additional medical evidence where other evidence in record provided sufficient basis for decision
• finding that several medical records including reports from neurologists and nurse practitioners, and physical capacity assessments to be sufficient evidence to determine RFC
• noting that the court will defer to assessments of subjective complaints that are “supported by good reasons and substantial evidence”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).