Jonathon Swink v. Andrew Saul

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the court must affirm the ALJ’s RFC assessment if a “reasonable mind would find [the evidence] adequate to support it.” (internal quotation omitted)
• holding ALJ is permitted to issue decision without obtaining additional medical evidence where other evidence in record provides sufficient basis for decision
• holding ALJ permitted to issue decision without obtaining additional medical evidence where other evidence in record provided sufficient basis for decision
• holding ALJ permitted to issue decision without obtaining additional medical evidence where other evidence in record provided sufficient basis for decision
• finding that several medical records including reports from neurologists and nurse practitioners, and physical capacity assessments to be sufficient evidence to determine RFC
• noting that the court will defer to assessments of subjective complaints that are “supported by good reasons and substantial evidence”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Laura Julin v. Carolyn W. Colvin
  Eighth Circuit· 2016-06-24· cited 291×
• Jessie Nash v. Commissioner, Social Security
  Eighth Circuit· 2018-11-02· cited 282×
• Clara B. ANDERSON, Appellant, v. Donna E. SHALALA, Secretary, Department of Health and Human Services, Appellee
  Eighth Circuit· 1995-04-06· cited 278×
• Kathleen J. Papesh v. Carolyn W. Colvin
  Eighth Circuit· 2015-05-27· cited 269×
• Sherry Despain v. Nancy A. Berryhill
  Eighth Circuit· 2019-06-14· cited 88×
• Mike Winn v. Commissioner, Social Security
  Eighth Circuit· 2018-07-06· cited 63×
• Karen Ash v. Carolyn W. Colvin
  Eighth Circuit· 2016-02-04· cited 23×