Jonathan Woodner Co. v. Laufer

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• clarifying that appellant, an attorney, could recover under a quantum meruit theory if he “present[ed] proof of the reasonable value of the services rendered in advancing” the client’s goal
• “Strictly speaking, a joint venture is not the same as a partnership, but there is very little law . . . applicable 23 to one that does not apply to the other.” (citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).