Jonathan Sheppard Stables v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that ‘fail[ure] to properly raise and preserve [those] issues’ under [Section] 111.11(a)(2
• holding that employer failed to comply with 34 Pa. Code § 111.11(a)(2) where it cryptically noted “2-10” on the appeal form, thereby failing to specify the errors of law committed by the WCJ or why the decision did not conform with the law
• holding employer waived issues not specified in appeal documents

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).