Jonathan Espy v. J2 Global, Inc.

Oral argument

• Argued

  41 min recording
  Listen

Source: CourtListener oral-argument corpus (CC0).

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an individual is in custody when “the officers establish[ ] a setting from which a reasonable person would believe that he or she was not free to leave”
• noting that “isolating the defendant from the outside world ... largely neutralizes the familiarity of the location as a factor affirmatively undermining a finding of coercion”
• explaining that “whether an individual detained during the execution of a search warrant has been unreasonably seized for Fourth Amendment purposes and whether that individual is ‘in custody’ for Miranda purposes are two different issues”
• stating that \whether an individual detained during the execution of a search warrant has been unreasonably seized for Fourth Amendment purposes and whether that individual is 'in custody' for Miranda 16 No. 2018AP319-CR.akz purposes are two different issues\
• finding “the extent to which the defendant is confronted with evidence of guilt” highly relevant to the Miranda determination
• finding “the extent to which the defendant is confronted with evidence of guilt” highly relevant to the Miranda determination

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).