· 4/19/2024
Jonathan Effinger v. the State of Texas
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “In the absence of any consequences for noncompliance, [a law’s] timing provisions are at best precatory rather than mandatory.”
- “In the absence of any consequences for noncompliance, . . . timing provisions are at best precatory rather than mandatory.”
- “In the absence of any consequences for noncompliance, [a law’s] timing provisions are at best precatory rather than mandatory.”
- “In the absence of any consequences for noncompliance, [a law’s] timing provisions are at best precatory rather than mandatory.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.