· 10/11/2023
Jonathan Davis v. the State of Texas
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that Mississippi had not sufficiently dismantled its prior de jure segregative university system even though it had implemented race-neutral policies
- holding that continuing racial identifiability is probative as to whether a state has dismantled its segregated system of higher education
- repudiating the notion that HBCUs may persist as “exclusively [B]lack enclaves by private choice” nearly thirty years ago
- repudiating the notion that HBCUs may persist as “exclusively [B]lack enclaves by private choice” nearly thirty years ago
- remanding case because district court’s analysis did not undertake the proper inquiries
- reiterating that Brown applies to public colleges and universities
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.