Skip to main content
· 9/1/2016

Jonathan D. Drewry v. State of Tennessee

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that we generally look to state contract law to determine whether third parties can enforce arbitration agreements
  • explaining that confusion over a judgment’s finality “could have harsh consequences, particularly with the rule then in effect that a premature notice of appeal was ineffectual if certain post-decision motions were also filed”
  • explaining that arguments omitted from the opening brief are deemed forfeited
  • explaining that arguments “omitted from the opening brief are deemed forfeited”
  • explaining that arguments omitted from the opening brief are deemed forfeited
  • explaining that arguments omitted from the opening brief are deemed forfeited

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Judge Robert W. Wedemeyer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.