Jon P. Goulet v. Educational Credit Management Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that bankruptcy court erred, in part, by drawing inferences that were not supported by the evidence
• holding that debtor’s substance abuse issues did not constitute additional circumstances under the second prong of the Brunner test where they did not impair his ability to work
• concluding that bankruptcy court erred, in part, by drawing inferences that were not supported by the evidence
• rejecting claim for undue hardship discharge in part because debtor “never made a single payment on his student loans”
• “By returning to graduate school at the age of 45 and voluntarily assuming the debt, [the debtor] must have believed that he had future earnings potential.”
• “By returning to graduate school at the age of 45 and voluntarily assuming the debt, [the debtor] must have believed that he had future earnings potential.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).