Jon Hunter Jervis v. the State of Texas

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that there might be “hypothetical situations in which the [Due Process Clause of] the Fourteenth Amendment might prohibit consecutive prosecutions of multiple offenses,” but ultimately finding no Due Process violations on the facts
• “‘[W]here a question of fact essential to the judgment is actually litigated and determined by a valid and final judgment, the determination is conclusive between the parties in a subsequent action on a different cause of action.’”
• dissenting opinion of Mr. Justice Douglas

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).