Jon E. Kinzenbaw and Kinze Manufacturing, Inc. v. Deere & Company and Eugene G. Keeton

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding commercial use when Defendant had farmers test farm equipment in secret
• \An applicant for patent . . . is not required to predict all future developments which enable the practice of his invention in substantially the same way.\
• “The doctrine of equiva- lents is designed to protect inventors from unscrupulous copyists and unanticipated equivalents.”
• Friedman, Markey, Rich, Davis, Baldwin

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).