Jon Davler, Inc. v. Arch Insurance Company

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that false imprisonment claims were covered 19 under the ERP Exclusion because “[a]n average layperson person would understand that the 20 exclusion applies to a category of claims: those arising in the employment setting”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).