Jon Bressler v. State of Wyoming, Ex Rel. Department of Workforce Services, Workers' Compensation Division

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the Rural Electrification Act does not preempt state rate regulation of rural electric cooperatives
• holding that this principle did not apply on the facts because the federal agency did not determine \as a matter of policy\ that the given area should be left unregulated
• holding that this principle did not apply on the facts because the federal agency did not determine “as a matter of policy” that the given area should be left unregulated
• holding that the agency’s \refusal ... to assert jurisdiction over rural power cooperatives” was not preemptive where agency \did not determine that, as a matter of policy, rural power cooperatives ... should be left unregulated”
• concluding that limiting FERC’s power to regulate specific aspects of the first sale of gas was a result of Congress’s desire to leave price and supply determinations of some first sales to the market
• holding that the AECC, as a wholesale provider of electricity to its members, could be subjected to APSC regulation without offending either the commerce clause or the supremacy clause of the United States Constitution

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).