Skip to main content
· 9/23/1975

Jolly v. Superior Court of Pinal County

Citations

  • 540 P.2d 658
  • 112 Ariz. 186
  • 1975 Ariz. LEXIS 348

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that special- action relief over discovery issues “shall be exercised only in ‘rare’ cases, as a matter of sound discretion according to the nature and circumstances of the case”
  • stating that special action relief over discovery issues “shall be exercised only in ‘rare’ cases, as a matter of sound discretion according to the nature and circumstances of the case”
  • refusing to extend privilege to internal safety investigation report of company
  • refusing to extend privilege to internal safety investigation report of company
  • “The fact that this Court does not routinely entertain petitions for extraordinary relief on discovery matters is apparent by the paucity of occasions in the past on which we have accepted jurisdiction over such actions.”
  • “[T]he courts have, on limited occasions, restricted discovery on grounds of irrelevancy.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Holohan, Cameron, Struckmeyer, Lockwood, Hays, Gordon

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.